태터데스크 관리자

도움말
닫기
적용하기   첫페이지 만들기

태터데스크 메시지

저장하였습니다.

The Center for Freedom of Information (CFOI) shared information about the National Assembly’s budget waste and the 18th Assembly members’ various types of privileges two years ago. At that time, the problems of touristic overseas business trips, exaggerated expenses for policy development and the support fund for Parliamentarian Society have been pointed out. Regarding the touristic overseas business trips, several Assembly members recently proved themselves that the problem had not been improved at all.


<Source: NEWSIS>


 The Assembly members are allowed to use “policy development expenses” within the limit of approximately 15 million won. The policy development expense is the Assembly budget supported to public hearings, debates, seminars and discussion meetings of professionals which allegedly additional supporting is also possible within approximately 8 million won. However, there were many cases that the money, which is supposed to be used for legislation and research & development of policies, was recklessly spent.


  Some Assembly members spent several million won
 for printing a few page long booklets or exaggerated the expense as if they printed out several hundred copies when they actually printed out only a few copies.

 

  In addition, they gave hundreds of thousands won rewards to people who attended the meeting or spent several million won for the food expenses of a one-day event. Policies cannot be properly developed as the budget on policy development is wasted like this.

 

Related articles:

 

 [한겨레- 정보공개센터 공동기획①] 정책개발비가 의원사금고

[한겨레- 정보공개센터 공동기획① ]정책자료집 발간비용뻥이야

'정책'없이 뻥튀긴 국회의원 정책개발비!

 

  We have requested information on policy development of the 19th National Assembly members. There were 1321 cases the Assembly members spent the budget for policy development expenses and its amount was 2,146,006,840 won. The Assembly members who developed policies the most were Choi Dong-ic and Choi Min-hee with 26 cases respectively followed by Namyoon In-soon, Eun Su-mi and Chang Ha-na with 24 cases of policy development respectively.

 

Choi Dong-ic

26

18,117,410

Choi Min-hee

26

13,112,000

Namyoon In-soon

24

18,187,900

Eun Su-mi

24

16,614,670

Chang Ha-na

24

13,503,790

Oh Young-sik

23

12,527,400

Yoon Myung-hee

21

17,613,710

Kim Sung-ju

19

15,515,450

Kim Choon-jin

19

14,981,330

Oh Byung-yun

18

13,421,570

Won Hye-young

18

18,562,000

 



<Partial information of the current state on policy development in order of the number of cases /Please refer to the attached file for the entire information of the current state on policy development>

 





  Of course there are some Assembly members who did not participate at all in developing policies. Having investigated the information provided by the Assembly and the current states of the 19th Assembly members, it was found that following 48 Assembly members did not get involved in any cases of policy development. Particularly, there were many members of the Saenuri Party and none of the Progressive Justice Party.

 

 

List of the 19th Assembly members who did not spend policy development expenses

Kang Gi Yun

Saenuri

Kang Ghil Boo

Saenuri

Kang Seok Ho

Saenuri

Kang Chang Hee

Saenuri

Kim Young Woo

Saenuri

Kim Tae Ho

Saenuri

Kim Tae Whan

Saenuri

Kim Tae Heum

Saenuri

Kim Han Gil

Democratic United

Kim Han Pyo

Non Partisan

Kim Hyung Tae

Saenuri

Kim Hoe Sun

Saenuri

Na Seong Lin

Saenuri

Roh Chul Rae

Saenuri

Moon Hee Sang

Democratic United

Min Byung Joo

Saenuri

Park Ki Choon

Democratic United

Park Dae Chul

Saenuri

Park Duk Hyum

Saenuri

Park Min Soo

Democratic United

Park Joo Sun

Non Partisan

Park Jie Won

Democratic United

Baek Kun Ki

Democratic United

Baek Jae Hyun

Democratic United

Shin Jang Yong

Democratic United

Ahn Duck Soo

Saenuri

Yoon Young Seok

Saenuri

Yun Ho Jung

Democratic United

Lee Man Woo

Saenuri

Rhee Mok Hee

Democratic United

Lee Yong Sup

Democratic United

Lee Woo Hyun

Saenuri

Lee Un Ryong

Saenuri

Lee In Young

Democratic United

Rhee In Je

Saenuri

Lee Jae Young

(Gyeonggi Peongtaek-si Eul)

Saenuri

Lee Hahn Koo

Saenuri

Lee Han Sung

Saenuri

Jeong Kab Yoon

Saenuri

Chung Doo Un

Saenuri

Chung Mong Joon

Saenuri

Jung Soo Sung

Saenuri

Chung Hee Soo

Saenuri

Cho Won Jin

Saenuri

Cho Jeong Sik

Democratic United

Cho Hae Jin

Saenuri

Choi Kyung Hwan

Saenuri

Han Sun Kyo

Saenuri

 

  There were some Assembly members that spent from tens of thousand won to tens of million won for the events such as debates, discussion meetings and forums. Following are the members that spent more than ten million won for one event.

 

< The Assembly Members who spent more than ten million won for one event >

Yoo

Jeong Bok

Collegiate Debating Contest on Public Health, Medical and Sanitary Policies

Debate

14,300,000

11/17

Lee

Yoon Seok

Ending the Controversy over Privatization of KTX, For Public Railroad Construction

Debate

13,250,000

9/26

Chyung Hojoon

What Are the Reasonable Plans For Protecting Financial Consumers?

Debate

12,994,480

12/27

Lee Cha Ik

R&D Strategies Forum for the advance of Ulsan in the Next 50 years

Forum

12,687,660

11/29

Song

 Kwang Ho

Seminar for Competitiveness Reinforcement of Agriculture and Fisheries

Seminar

12,093,910

11/28

Sung

Woan Jong

Discussion Meeting on how to improve Oil Pollution Damage Compensation System

Discussion Meeting

11,737,000

12/17

Lee

Jong Jin

Debate on Connecting Metro Line 1 with National Industrial Complex

Debate

11,657,700

11/9

Lee

Jae Gyoon

Debate on the Next governments Realization of Maritime Power

Debate

11,548,340

7/17

Park

Seong-Ho

Discussion Meeting with Marriage Migrants for Happy Multi Cultural Families

Discussion Meeting

10,611,120

9/24

Ham

Jin Gyu

Public Hearing on Transfer and inheritance of Private Taxi License

Public Hearing

10,600,220

12/21

Shon

In Chun

Debate on Job Creation through Activating Womens Startups in the Knowledge and Technology sector

Debate

10,303,460

10/24

Suh

Byung Soo

Seminar on the Management system and Governance of Urban Restoration

Seminar

10,000,000

7/12

 

 Of course, using more than ten million won does not directly mean they wasted or exaggerated the policy development expense since it can only be fully understood with documented evidence and outcome of policy development. (CFOI is planning to check documented evidence.)

  But some titles look suspicious. It makes us wonder why such a big money had to be spent for the debates on these kinds of topics.

  The legislation and developing policies are the rights as well as the duties of lawmakers. Not being able to make appropriate policies can be regarded not fulfilling their duties. CFOI will continue to supervise the Assembly and its members in order for the Assembly to become transparent and the members to do their duties and responsibilities themselves.

 

Attached is the disclosed current state of legislation and policy development.

 

입법정책개발비.xlsx


 



 


저작자 표시 비영리
신고

댓글을 달아 주세요

9월의 후원회원 667명
Statistics Graph
  • 4,525,664
  • 4021,303

전체보기 (4306)
공지사항 (163)
오늘의정보공개청구 (1468)
정보공개청구 (112)
공터학교 다시보기 (7)
알권리제도 (70)
센터안내 (1731)
이화동 광장 (702)
정보공개 in English (50)

투명사회를 위한 정보공개센터

opengirok's Blog is powered by Tattertools / Supported by Tatter & Media
Copyright by opengirok [ http://www.ringblog.com ]. All rights reserved.

Tattertools Tatter & Media DesignMyself!
정보공개센터 (우)03100 서울시 종로구 이화동 135번지(새주소 : 이화장길 20) 삼영빌딩 2층 | 전화 02-2039-8361 | 팩스 : 02-6919-2039 | 이메일 cfoi@hanmail.net
후원계좌안내 : 우리은행 1005-001-355172 (예금주 : 투명사회를위한정보공개센터)
The Center for Fredom of Information and Transparent Society

티스토리 툴바